Casually Explained: The Carbon Scale

@dim_107 Stop lying to yourself and eat plant based. www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ar4-wg3-chapter8-1.pdf

@Zev S yes I know. But we emmit a smaller amount of methane to the atmosphere. So if I remember correctly global warming is caused 70% because carbon dioxide, 14% because of methane ,and the other 16% is some other stuff. So a plant based diet would help a little but not as much as moving to clean energy

@dim_107 methane is four times more potent than CO2 when it comes to climate change. climatenexus.org/climate-issues/food/animal-agricultures-impact-on-climate-change/#:~:text=Consequences%20and%20Impacts,to%20the%20livestock%20sector%20annually.

Nope, the only thing that would happen is we would stop producing methane which is 14 % of the greenhouse gass

Huh?

He didn't send it Indian companies like reddys and serum institute makes them with Indian government with shared donation for Poor's and AVG people and it have saved millions I also got polio vaccination for free .

fica games11 lol good morning not an anti vaxxer and I feel like it’s hard to find reliable sources on most Indian websites

Only if you rely on english anti-vax websites, it's hard to find an reliable indian source

chaotic evil in a nutshell

It really depends on power consumption and energy source.

fica games11 the methane produced from cows, the amount of deforestation, the erosion of soil and land, the water degradation, the amount of food agriculture that is being used to feed these animals whereas the food could just be directly fed to humans and not lose any nutrients through the animal’s digestive process... so much waste and carbon emissions being contributed to animal agriculture. I wish it was 10% tbh

Wrong, it's 10% of co² emissions

@fica games11 I didn't mean donate to other charities. I said directly to "charitable causes." Direct checks to the people in need. No foundation in the way. Obviously you can't read.

@LittleBytes Assumming every other charities is actually effective

@dim_107 The numbers that I've found max out at around $50 billion total for charitable causes (www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/3169864001). Also, around $36 billion of that was to his own foundation, meaning that he can do whatever he wants with the money while it's in his "non-profit" and in addition since he technically "made a donation to a charitable cause" even though very little of the money in his foundation is ACTUALLY going to help people, he gets to write it off in his taxes. It's the same for several other billionaires. Sometimes they end up having the government owe THEM money which in turn causes even more pain for everyday Americans because funding for beneficial programs like welfare, social security, and medicare gets cut. If the Gates actually cared, they would cut the foundation shit and just straight up write blank checks to charitable causes and give it directly to the people in need. When you donate to a foundation, a lot of the money is squandered before it actually makes it to those who need it for future reference.

He gave 60 billion to charity

No, imperial is stupid

I haven't seen real snow since I was 10

?

Damn man he couldnt give like 2 billion without going bankrupt let alone 10x that. And the ozone layer is on its way to fix itself fully in our lifetime, stop believing what media wants you to believe

Bill mostly specializes in stopping disease in Africa, his work against climate change is sort of just to bring attention to it and point out that it's a problem and he doesn't fully commit to it.

Lmao 20 billion dollars?! The guy would be bankrupt xD

@Felty Ash that's because the sun only hits the top of the trees and the heating only takes place there

@Green Green oohhhhh shit sorry I'm just high af, but my forest is really cool so they clearly don't produce much heat

​@Felty Ash no, i'm talking about the heat from the sun, think of it like this: the trees absorb light, light is energy, the trees are now overcharged with energy and must get rid of it somehow so they turn the energy into heat witch makes the air around the tree hotter. got it?

@Green Green yeah trees absorb heat so it's not as hot? Are you brain dead?

or plant bamboo, bamboo grows much faster so it would suck up more CO2, plus bamboo is light green while tree leafs are dark green witch means bamboo reflects light and heat from the sun while trees absorb it.

Lmao you believe anything exists and this is not just a matrix? Sheep

and on how long you use it